WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) – White House officials are discussing proposals for a digital trade agreement covering Indo-Pacific economies as the administration seeks ways to check China’s influence in the region, according to people familiar with the plans.
Details of the potential agreement are still being drafted, but the pact could potentially include countries such as Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore, according to one of the people, who asked not to be identified because the process is not public.
The deal could set out standards for the digital economy, including rules on the use of data, trade facilitation and electronic customs arrangements, according to another person.
It also would show the Biden administration is interested in pursuing new trade opportunities after spending its first months focused more on enforcing existing deals than advancing negotiations with Britain and Kenya that were inherited from the Trump administration.
Perhaps most important, the policy would represent an early effort by the Biden administration to present an economic plan for the world’s most economically and strategically significant region after former president Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal in 2017.
Officials at the White House and the Office of the US Trade Representative did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Advocates for such an accord, including former acting Deputy US Trade Representative Wendy Cutler, suggest that it could draw on existing arrangements in the region, including the US-Japan Digital Trade Agreement, as well as other agreements struck between regional nations such as the Singapore-Australia Digital Trade Agreement and the Singapore-New Zealand-Chile Digital Economy Partnership Agreement.
A digital trade agreement would “get the United States back in the trade game in Asia, while it considers the merits of rejoining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP)”, Cutler, a long-time trade negotiator who is now vice-president of the Asia Society Policy Institute, wrote in an April op-ed together with Joshua Meltzer, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.
“We’re very much in favor of the negotiation of a digital agreement, particularly in the absence of TPP,” said Charles Freeman, the senior vice-president for Asia at the US Chamber of Commerce in Washington.
“We’d like to see some sort of forward-looking, rules-based agreement in the region, in particular as a model for a global agreement. We think the time to do it is now.”
Such an agreement could sidestep at least some of the political pitfalls which have stymied previous trade negotiations, including opposition from labour unions. It also would not need approval in Congress, where opposition among progressive Democrats has blocked some deals for years. Even among Republicans there is little support for comprehensive free-trade pacts after Trump’s criticism of deals reached by his predecessors.
“One of the many challenges with modern trade policy is figuring out how do you balance the various competing interests in a comprehensive deal with manufacturing, labor, agriculture, services, rules for the environment,” said Nigel Cory, associate director of trade policy at the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, a non-partisan think tank.
“It’s a very challenging and complicated task, whereas with digital-trade-specific agreements it’s a little more straightforward.”
Still, the Biden administration will have to square the proposal with its “worker-centred trade policy,” outlined by US Trade Representative Katherine Tai.
Some administration officials have publicly hinted at a potential agreement.
“For the United States to be really effective in Asia we’re going to need to make clear that we have an economic plan, a series of engagements and you will see pieces of that over the course of the next little while,” Kurt Campbell, the White House’s top official for Asia, told an event on July 6.
Campbell added that the administration was looking into “what might be possible on the digital front”, without elaborating.
